Judicial Overload: the Reasons and the Remedies
نویسنده
چکیده
A nimosity towards lawyers, perennial in our social history long before Watergate, parallels a contradictory and equally persistent belief in judges as problem-solvers for a variety of personal, economic, educational and political ills. An increasing number of litigants are bringing to the courts not only the class of disputes that has been the traditional fare of judicial decision-making, but also an array of issues that were formerly resolved in private meetings, at hospitals, in schools, or at home. The causes of this explosion of lawsuits and the possible buffers to an eventual implosion in our judicial system will be discussed below.'
منابع مشابه
comparative comparision on Applying judicial remedies methods on the error of the administrative office
Error is instances of illegality,although there is a strong belief in the validity of the act,but judicial review of it can be accompanied by enforcement and judicial remedies.The court,in addition to the Certiorari in error of law cases in the verdict,can replace the true decision.The prohibitory order can only be made after the decision has been made by the public authority in order to prev...
متن کاملاقامه دعوای جبران خسارت زیست محیطی در نظام حقوق ایران
Abstract Having a healthy environment is one of the fundamental rights which are taken into Accont in the constitution. In addition to private persons who are obliged to prevent environmental pollution, governmental organizations are responsible for protecting the environment too. Environmental protection requires observance of a series of principles in operation and an effective basis for e...
متن کاملCauses of Judicial and Legal Criminal Policy Disagreement in Drug-Related Offenses from the Legal-Ethical Approach
Background: The legislative review of the criminal record on the crime of repetition and the severity of the punishment for repeated offenders indicates that the legislator firstly used various laws to include repetition of crime, and in some cases such as drug offenses and for criminal reasons. It has taken into account a certain degree of exacerbation that is markedly different from what is s...
متن کاملحق دادخواهی و مصونیت قضایی دولت ها: رأی دیوان بین المللی دادگستری در اختلاف آلمان و ایتالیا
The conflict between the rights of States as the primary subjects of international law on the one hand and the rights of individuals as the subsidiary subjects of this legal corpus on the other hand is crystallized in the twenty-first century. Among others, the conflict between the right of individuals to have access to judicial remedies and States immunity from national judicial jurisdiction i...
متن کامل